I'm not sure if everyone else has noticed how the media has gone crazy with the whole Ebola in the US topic, but this caught my eye and I figured it'd be a great piece to talk about.
The Wall Street Journal is accusing the Democratic Party of being "Pro-Ebola". They feel that the CDC funds are not sufficient to support and protect our country against an agent such as this. I would like to know what do you think about this? Do you believe that political parties are supporting lower funding of medical practices and protection plans?
To read the full article please click here.
Although common conspiracy theories declare that political parties are keeping the pharmaceutical companies under their thumb to maintain control on the US citizens and also use as a buffer for the economy, check our this list of supposed theories that are "true" here.
The writers for Trueactivist.com are saying that the CDC knowingly placed cancer causing agents in vaccines. Trueactivist.com is not the only website that believes that the government is trying to control the people with medical issues, Lymphomation.org is also another supporter of this theory. You can check our their site here.
What I would like to know is if you believe that this is not only possible, but actually happening. Do you think that our government, sworn to help the people, and the many doctors and people who have dedicated their lives to helping us are actually doing us harm to advance other causes? Would this type of sacrifice be worth harming so many people if this is indeed happening?

No comments:
Post a Comment